My Conclusion or Just the Beginning?

When I first picked my topic and started to research it I honestly had no idea which way my findings would take me. I am satisfied with the information I have found and it has answered most of the initial questions I had set to find out. 
All my sources were very helpful in my quest. Although some contradicted what others said like the words of Dr. Zavos compared to some articles and academic journals I read, they were all very helpful. In conclusion they all helped me reach the answer that was most suitable to the idea I was exploring.
As for my main question: To what extent should we allow cloning? It can still be argued intensely with ethics and other reasons but I have found the answer I wanted. We should allow cloning to the extent of stem cell research of all kinds of stem cells whether they be adult or embryo. 
The questions that still linger in my mind though are when America will open up to this idea  and why it had not been legalized a long time ago. One question that has arisen through all this is very hard to answer but makes me wonder: why do people make such an issue ethical and political, when it is clearly logistical?
I'm sure I will keep to speed with the rulings of Lamberth and the further information of the ruling, in order to see where this goes. It is a very interesting subject and I really do want to know what the courts will do about it.
I will definitely want to argue for the side of stem cell cloning especially if it comes to the point of voting I will vote yes. I really do believe stem cell research cloning could do wonders if governments would just give it a chance.